Materiality of ESG issues takes center stage at US congress
15 July 2019 - By Marjella Lecourt-Alma
Last updated on 26 September
Wednesday 10th July marked the first ever congressional hearing on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in the United States.
Entitled "Building a Sustainable and Competitive Economy: An Examination of Proposals to Improve Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosures," the hearing was held by the Subcommittee on Investor Protection, Entrepreneurship, and Capital Markets. It was chaired by Carolyn Maloney from the Democratic Party, Representative for New York.
Standardizing ESG disclosure
With evidence mounting that companies who perform better on ESG disclosures also perform better financially, investors are increasingly clamoring for improved disclosure. Indeed, Maloney named ESG “one of the most important topics in the markets right now.” Although she felt this desire for disclosure represented progress, she added that “more must be done.”
“ESG disclosures,” Maloney argued, “often aren’t as detailed as they should be,” and because of the lack of a legalized framework, they’re also “difficult to compare across companies.” In order to standardize and embed disclosure that is comprehensive and consistent, she argued that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would need to establish standards on ESG disclosure that will apply to all public companies in the US. As such, the committee debated drafts of five bills that would require public companies to reveal more information on topics including climate policies, political expenditure, and human rights.
Disclosing on climate change
The hearing was attended by a number of leading figures in the sustainability arena, who shared their perspectives on the proposed legislation and outlined their views on how to improve ESG disclosures. Among them was Mindy Lubber, CEO and President of Ceres, a non-profit organization which works with influential investors and companies to tackle the world’s biggest sustainability challenges. She called for mandatory public disclosure of climate-related risks. “Climate change is the greatest economic crisis of this decade, and beyond,” she said. “And its implications must be disclosed.” Citing recent examples of Nike and Pepsico, who acted quickly to put a stop to concerning practices in their supply chains, she also argued that disclosure actually forces companies to manage ESG issues.
A single global standard
A lot hinges on the way that companies understand ESG issues. Tim Mohin, Chief Executive of the GRI, developer of the world’s most widely used sustainability reporting standards, said: “Climate change, human rights, ethics, diversity, environment, health and safety – these are critical issues. If they were included in the financial definition of materiality, we might not have these massive issues we’re facing today.”Various frameworks exist to provide guidance, the two discussed at the hearing being the GRI and the CDP, a non-profit organization that runs the global disclosure system for investors, companies, cities, states and regions to manage their environmental impacts. Yet the lack of a legal framework serves only to create inconsistency in disclosure across different companies. Mohin added: “Just like financial disclosure, it’s essential that this committee, and policymakers around the world, focus on a single global standard, because we need a common global language if we are going to unlock free trade and capital flows that increasingly depend on this information.”
There was a consensus that an issue can be material regardless of whether it’s financial or non-financial: “Some like to believe that sustainability risks are not real financial risks,” said Lubber. “But let’s be clear: risks are risks, and they need to be disclosed – whether they come from trade agreements, fluctuating commodity prices, inflation, or climate change.”James Andrus, Investment Manager, Sustainable Investments at California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), stated that environmental disclosures are necessary to reveal how companies will be able to generate sustainable returns in the future. He argued that all investors, from private individuals to large institutions, “should have access to financial reporting disclosures that allow providers of capital to make informed decisions whether to buy, sell, or hold certain securities.”
The first step towards mandatory ESG disclosure?
Poignantly, Vargas expressed his regret that “The United States is not leading on this as we should be.” Given Republican control of the Senate and President Donald Trump’s emphasis on deregulation, it’s by no means certain that any of these draft proposals will become legislation. But in keeping with the themes of transparency and disclosure, bringing them into the open in this landmark hearing is a crucial – albeit belated – first step.
The proposed bills discussed were:
ESG Disclosure Simplification Act of 2019
Shareholder Protection Act of 2019
Corporate Human Rights Risk Assessment, Prevention and Mitigation Act of 2019
Climate Risk Disclosure Act of 2019
Country by Country Tax Payment Disclosure.
Reactions from the market
Evan Harvey, Global Head of Sustainability at Nasdaq, commented: “We are very pleased to see Congress take up the issue of ESG disclosure. Nasdaq has long advocated better understanding of ESG dynamics in the market, more equitable access to decision-making data, and better metrics themselves. Any emerging standard — whether voluntary or compulsory, driven by industry or government — must reckon with the disclosure burden that companies already bear and strike a balance between the burden and benefit of transparency.”
The discussion was indicative of increasing regulation in ESG disclosure. In the UK, it will be a mandatory requirement for all listed companies and large asset owners to report on climate-related risks and opportunities in line with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations by 2022.
Marjella Lecourt-Alma, CEO and co-founder of Datamaran, said: “It's another milestone to see this topic being discussed in US Congress. The problem with umbrella terms like ‘ESG’ or ‘sustainability’ is that they fail to capture the overall sense of urgency. Breaking them down into separate topics, like climate risk, can create that sense of urgency. When it comes to climate we can all see it happening around us; for those outside the community, it's evident this risk is real and clearly financial. Focusing on a single topic, a sense of urgency and the short-term financial impact is the way to the hearts and wallets of mainstreet."
Update: 30 July 2019
Update: 26 September 2019
TCFD: An update on corporate disclosure following the second status report
In June 2019, the TCFD released its second status report, indicating increased adoption of its recommendations.
To coincide with its release, we are updating our previous analysis into the extent to which this adoption has been reflected in supporters’ corporate disclosure.
The analysis shows that, whether they’re supporters or non-supporters of the TCFD, companies are now talking about climate change more than ever before. More in detail, climate change is predominantly discussed through a risk rather than an opportunity lense – with 54% of FinServ TCFD supporters referring to the topic in relation to risk and 20% in relation to opportunity in 2018.
To read the full report, please fill in the form on the right.